Answer:
better understanding how foreign operations affect the company's competitive advantage.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Christopher would greatly benefit by better understanding how foreign operations affect the company's competitive advantage. Mostly due to the fact that it would allow Christopher to determine certain aspects or scenarios that the company may not realize and maybe help him climb in the ranks.
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
Answer:
b. all development cost are expensed as incurred
I would say that the answer to this question is most likely staff. Just
as departments are subdivisions and part of a larger organization,
employees are part of a larger staff or workforce.
Answer:
C) examination of supporting documents
Explanation:
<em>Examination of supporting documents</em>, is a type of supporting schedule, which is designed to show detailed tests performed, does not tie into the general ledger, but must state a positive or negative conclusion about the objective of the test.
