The correct answer is personalization.
This is a type of fallacy where you involve somebody's personality into an argument, even though it is completely unnecessary or wrong to do that. For example, if you are going to a dinner party and you are late, and the dinner is overcooked (completely unrelated to you being late), you might start thinking that it happened because of your tardiness, whereas that is obviously not the case.
Answer:
The correct is D. He wanted to avoid having the congressional map challenged in court.
Explanation:
Governor Lee Cruce clashed with the Democratic Party on several policies, including higher education and local interest projects. Another one of their differences was the plan to gerrymander Oklahoma in 1912.
Cruce was opposed to gerrymandering Oklahoma as he wished to avoid having the congressional map challenged in court. As per the rules of the Supreme Court, four among the nine Justices had to vote to accept a case. Lee's veto of the gerrymandering plan angered many of the Democrats and eventually contributed to his break with the Democratic Party.
Answer: A. their opinions and feelings about the program (happy to help)
Explanation:
