I think the answer is A. Defendant
The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.
<h3>What is the case of Dabney v. State?</h3>
The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.
Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.
Read more about Dabney v. State
brainly.com/question/26537644
#SPJ1
Answer:c.0.8
Explanation:
Adults with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 or more are guilty of a DUI, but there is a “Zero Tolerance” law for drivers under 21 years old. This means that drivers who show a 0.01 BAC will face charges for drunk driving.
Answer:
the purpose of a will is so you can give you recent belongings and money to you family and friends.
Explanation:
Answer:
$30,000 - $6,000 = $24,000
$24,000 to finance at 4.71% for 60 months
24,000 divided by 60 = $400/month + 4.71% ( $18.84) = $418.84/month.
Explanation: