The correct answer for this question is this one: "TRUE." With regard to the Electoral College it is believed to be the most democratic way to elect the president and vice president, encouraging states to giveresponsibility for elections to the federal government.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The bullwhip effect can be explained as an occurrence detected by the supply chain where orders sent to the manufacturer and supplier create larger variance then the sales to the end customer. These irregular orders in the lower part of the supply chain develop to be more distinct higher up in the supply chain. This variance can interrupt the smoothness of the supply chain process as each link in the supply chain will over or underestimate the product demand resulting in exaggerated fluctuations.
CAUSES
There are many factors said to cause or contribute to the bullwhip effect in supply chains; the following list names a few:
1. Disorganization between each supply chain link; with ordering larger or smaller amounts of a product than is needed due to an over or under reaction to the supply chain beforehand.
2. Lack of communication between each link in the supply chain makes it difficult for processes to run smoothly. Managers can perceive a product demand quite differently within different links of the supply chain and therefore order different quantities.
3. Free return policies; customers may intentionally overstate demands due to shortages and then cancel when the supply becomes adequate again, without return forfeit retailers will continue to exaggerate their needs and cancel orders; resulting in excess material.
4. Order batching; companies may not immediately place an order with their supplier; often accumulating the demand first. Companies may order weekly or even monthly. This creates variability in the demand as there may for instance be a surge in demand at some stage followed by no demand after.
6. Price variations – special discounts and other cost changes can upset regular buying patterns; buyers want to take advantage on discounts offered during a short time period, this can cause uneven production and distorted demand information.
7. Demand information – relying on past demand information to estimate current demand information of a product does not take into account any fluctuations that may occur in demand over a period of time.
Answer: (C) Cognitive Intervention
Explanation:
A cognitive intervention is a type of psychological intervention practiced in counselling, it's a general descriptive for a variety of therapeutic approaches which are used to to address physiological issues that affects the mind.
It is also associated with cognitive therapy, which deals on the thinking process and the way by which emotions have bearing on the human mind.
Some of the advantages of the putting-out system are:
- The weavers do not have to buy the tools
- The weavers were not tasked with selling the clothes.
<h3>What was the Putting Out System?</h3>
This refers to the sub-contracting work that is done when merchants hire weavers to make clothes for them for a fee.
Hence, we can see that some of the disadvantages of the putting-out system were:
- The weavers were poorly paid
- The weavers were dependent on the merchants, etc.
Read more about the putting out system here:
brainly.com/question/9428499
#SPJ1
The chronological order of how events led to modern-day restrictions on voting rights is:
- After Reconstruction, discriminatory voting laws are passed that disenfranchise people based on race.
- The Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires federal oversight of voting rights in districts with a history of discrimination.
- More African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans vote and are elected to office.
- The Supreme Court rules in Shelby v. Holder that criteria to determine which districts need federal oversight are no longer valid.
- States again begin passing laws to restrict voting rights.
<h3>What is the history of voting rights in U.S.?</h3>
After the Reconstruction that came with the end of the Civil War, Southern States enacted laws aimed at keeping minority groups from voting.
These laws were overcome with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and more minority groups like African and Latino Americans were able to vote and get into office.
With the Supreme Court ruling in Shelby v. Holder in 2013 however, states began imposing restrictions again and especially in minority districts.
Find out more on voting rights in the U.S. at brainly.com/question/582433.
