Antitrust laws generally promote (or encourage, make possible, increase support, etc) competition - they work against establishing monopolies
Patents limit (decrease, make impossible, etc,) competition - they establish a monopoly on a certain good or service.
Matt and Kim will meet one another at the movies I hope that it makes sense to you
I think your answer will be to 'soak up.'
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
Protecting their child or children against Bad minded people.2 they want to teach good habits which can be destroyed bad bad thingking minded groups
