Answer:
50%
Step-by-step explanation:
(V2−V1)|V1|×100
=(7.5−5)|5|×100
=2.55×100
=0.5×100
=50%change
=50%increase
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
(1)
Given
g(r) = (r + 14)² - 49
To obtain the zeros, let g(r) = 0 , that is
(r + 14)² - 49 = 0 ( add 49 to both sides )
(r + 14)² = 49 ( take the square root of both sides )
r + 14 = ± 
= ± 7 ( subtract 14 from both sides )
r = - 14 ± 7, then
r = - 14 - 7 = - 21 ← smaller r
r = - 14 + 7 = - 7 ← larger r
(2)
The equation of a parabola in vertex form is
y = a(x - h)² + k
where (h, k) are the coordinates of the vertex and a is a multiplier
g(r) = (r + 14)² - 49 ← is in vertex form
with vertex = (- 14, - 49 )
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of significant figures in the numbers are
- 100 cm = 1 significant digit
- 0.006700 cm = 2 significant digits
- 450. cm = 3 significant digits
<h3>How to determine the number of significant figures in the following numbers?</h3>
As a general rule, the zeros before and after the non-zero figures are not significant.
Using the above rule, we have:
- 100 cm = 1 significant digit
- 0.006700 cm = 2 significant digits
- 450. cm = 3 significant digits
<h3>
How to round the following numbers to the correct number of significant figures</h3>
Using the above rule in (a), we have:
- 123g to show 1 sig fig = 100 g
- 0.19851m to show 2 sig figs = 0.2 m
- 0.0057034L to show 3 sig figs = 0.005703 L
<h3>How to report the following answers with correct significant figures</h3>
We have:
(12.93cm) x (2.34cm) x (8cm) = 242.05 cm^3 because 12.93 has 4 significant figures
67.0m / 2.18s = 30.7 m/s because 2.18 has 3 significant figures
<h3>How to convert the following metric to metric</h3>
450mL = 0.45 L
because 1 mL = 0.001 L
2.3 dm = 0.00023 km
because 1 dm = 0.0001 km
0.120cg = 1.2 mg
because 1 cg = 10 mg
6700L = 670000 cL
because 1 L = 100 cL
<h3>How to convert the following metric</h3>
a. 2.34miles = 3.76 km (1mile = 1.61km) -- given
b. 5.3ft = 161.544 cm(2.54cm = 1 in)
Because 1 ft = 30.48 cm
Read more about significant figures at:
brainly.com/question/24491627
#SPJ1
False because a number is rational if we can write it as a fraction where the top number of and bottom number are both whole numbers but irrational numbers is any number that is not rational. It is a number that cannot be written as a ratio of two integers(or cannot be expressed as a fraction)
