Answer:
B. there is no proximate cause between the breach of duty and the injury.
Explanation:
In law, proximate cause is a situation when the action of the defendant is directly causing the negative situation that happened to the other party.
From the case above, Homer could try to argue to the judge/juries that the reason why Patty tripped is because of her cat rather than his crash.
The judge and juries can either agree or disagree with homer depending on their personal outlook of the situation. But nevertheless, it's the best defense that Homer has.
Answer
Social evils are the factors that may disrupt the social life to a large extent. They have the capacity to introduce disturbances and troubles in the lives of the individuals inhabiting the society and the overall social norms, values, relations, and activities.
I believe the answer is: <span>Making the punishment occur only on a partial, sporadic schedule
cutting the punishment down into a partial will make the impact of the punishment significantly less compared to what is supposed to be.
In order to increase the effect of the punishment one thing you could do is put something you love as a collateral in the punishment.</span>
I assume your question is why does he have to leave the room before the final discussion?
Well, he might have, as an active member of the IRB, a conflict of interest, meaning that he could be biased to vote in favor of his work which is incorrect, as researchers need to be objective regarding what they are studying. The National Academy Press. (2009). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Is a great book you might read to understand the duties of any IRB and its members responsibilities, also the researchers' behavior. On it, is detail why a conflict of interest can guide to the decision of not conducting a certain research, independently of the undeniable reputation of Dr. Jones.
Charcoal is black when you buy it.
When you burn it, it turns red.
After burning, the charcoal is grey.