According to khrushchev what will be the result of US actions

1 answer:

7 0

According to Khrushchev the results of the US remained unknown and a bit complicated. Khrushchev said the U.S. was setting up military blocs with other countries so that it could gain a dominant position in the capitalist world. They claimed as Khrushchev would put it that they were doing so to defend themselves against communist threat but that, according to him was based on a lie. In addition, the arms race was supposed to result in a balance of power.

However, it was obvious that a move like that could easily lead to war. In simple words, he thinks that U.S. is a capitalist state and would start a World War III. As is evident today, when nations start competing among themselves and start showcasing who has military might than the other, the danger of war increases.

You might be interested in

The state of nevada passes legislation that bans speakers from hallways in academic buildings on university campuses in order to

swat32

<span>No, because the right to free speech allows for a reasonable regulation of time, place, and manner so long as the regulation is content neutral.
The right of free speech that Citizens in United States have extended until those citizens cause a certain amount of harm toward other citizens. If this happens, both other citizens and the Defense Department have the right to stop the speech..
</span>

3 0

3 years ago

the Pacific Ocean spans over 65 million square miles and covers 30% of the Earth's surface this Daemon is an example of which of

9966 [12]

This would be a FACT.

3 0

3 years ago

How did Alied forces surprise Axis forces at Normandy?

inysia [295]

Answer: A

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

A 6-column table with 2 rows. Column 1 not labeled with entries total G D P in 2009, G D P per capita. Column 2 is labeled Spain

Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Explanation:

i got it wrg on ed

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why were the articles of confederation insufficient

Ilya [14]

The government wasn't powerful enough. They couldn't even tax the people, so the government was too broke to offer any kind of assistance when it's country was in need. (Couldn't afford a military when they needed it, for example -- there were a lot of domestic issues that they couldn't take care of.)

4 0

3 years ago