<em>practical wisdom
</em>
Phronesis refers to intelligence, prudence, practical action and good judgement. It is just not wisdom by itself, but coupled with practical virtue, thus the term “practical wisdom”.
Aristotle explains that ethics has a purpose, and that is to become good. He further discusses virtue as practical, emphasizing that merely knowing is not enough. The understanding of ethics should be demonstrated.
The factor that usually does not matter much is changing the legal smoking age. There are many smokers that are underage and most of them start in their early teens, so it's usually not important whether or not you make it legal or illegal, they will still find a way to smoke.
<span>Article IV of the Constitution lays out the relationship of states to other states, and states themselves to the Federal Government. It details the obligations that a state has to another state, or other groups of states. It also details the responsibilities that the Federal Government has over individual states or groups of states. These relationships can become quite complex, but stem from simple principles.</span>
Answer:
D. cognitive
Explanation:
Cognitive psychologist: The term cognitive psychologist refers to the mental health professionals who have completed a Master's degree in psychology and tends to understand human being's thoughts, behaviors, and mental processes.
Cognitive psychologists are considered to be interested in topics including reasoning, attention, memory, problem-solving, retrieval & forgetting, and visual & auditory perception.
In the question above, the given hypothesis would most likely be tested by cognitive psychologists.
This is a very philosophical question, so it requires your own opinions and reasoning. I will help as much as I can for you to develop your thoughts, but I cannot write them for you.
One of the most important things for you to reference in question two is the natural state of man. How was it like? Are we peaceful and individualistic, as John Locke states in <em>Two Treatise of Government</em>, or are humans selfish and natural life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" as Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes state in <em>The Prince </em>and <em>The Leviathan </em>(respective titles)? Why is this so?
These philosophers also give a reason as to why government is necessary for humankind. For Locke, it is to protect the people from larger threats. For Hobbes, it is to make man civilized. For Machiavelli, it is for a leader to align their self-interest with those of the people and make a prosperous community.
If you need any more help, ask me! I hope this helps :)
