Answer:
The understanding including its context has been explained throughout the explanation segment elsewhere here.
Explanation:
- The relational leadership style wants to replicate the understanding that organizational culture ultimately resulted from those throughout the actions including its exemplary entrepreneur with either the perspective that leadership moves away from relations between people, gatherings.
- Relational leadership acknowledges that perhaps the performance of the connections clients construct seems to be the surprise to relevance and success.
- This methodology takes time to build as well as accomplish the goals of organizations, requirements, standards of practices, and so much more. Relational leadership could sometimes be extremely successful, especially whether it is accurate, caring, and compassionate, strengthened by hand movements of companionship but instead embodied mostly in the cultural values of an organization.
Answer: C. Both parties now have an obligation to their agreement.
Explanation:
When parties get into a contract, they have a legal obligation to each other to fulfill their part of the agreement or the other party will be able to seek redress in a court of law.
Terrance and the bank are now parties to an agreement to provide Terrence with a loan to buy a house. The bank will have to fulfill this obligation by giving Terrence the loan and Terrence will fulfill his side of the agreement by making payments as stipulated in the loan covenant.
Journal entries
Dr Allowance for uncollectible account $41,000
Cr Account Receivable $41,000
Dr Account receivable $3,600
Cr Allowance for uncollectible account $3,600
Dr Cash $3,600
Cr Account receivable $3,600
Answer:
The correct option is D) The design of the study suffers from selection bias.
Explanation:
In research, Selection Bias occurs when the researcher decides who the respondents are or those who are being evaluated or studied.
Every research ought to be designed in such a way that the respondents are selected at random.
In the information provided, the respondents were selected from a group of people who on a balance of probability were already inclined to decline because it was a list of dissatisfied customers. The chances of them declining to respond or responding with a negative were higher than the chances of them indicating that they would buy and this defeats the purpose of the research. The research ought to have also included a sample of respondents who didn't have the product, who had enjoyed the services of the company and were content, those who didn't even know what the product did until they got the survey.
That way holistic information can be obtained from the research about how different sets of people will react and not just those who are already dissatisfied with the company's product(s).
Some of the ways to avoid selection bias in research are:
- To employ the use of random techniques selecting sample sets from populations.
- To check that the traits or characteristics of the larger population are well represented in the samples selected
Cheers
Answer:
COGS= $31,597.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct materials $13.00
Direct labor 8.80
Manufacturing overhead 16.50
Last year, Wooten & McMahon Enterprises produced and sold 825 units
First, we need to calculate the cost of goods manufactured:
cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP
cost of goods manufactured= 0 + 13 + 8.8 + 16.5 - 0= $38.3
Total cost of goods manufactured= 825*38.3= $31,597.5
Now, we can calculate the cost of goods sold:
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured - ending finished inventory
COGS= 0 + 31,597.5 - 0= $31,597.5
