W(-7,-4) indicates the reflection across y=x. (x,y) transformed to (y,x). w(-7,-4) =w(7,4).
w'(7,-4) indicates the reflection across y-axis. (x,y) is transformed to (-x,y). w(-7,-4) = w(7,-5).
Explanation:
The rules for reflecting over the X axis is to negotiate the value of the y coordinate of each point and x is same.
After reflection the coordinates of the figure can be determined. If you reflect over the x-axis, then keep the x-coordinate and take the opposite of y- coordinate. If you reflect over y-axis, then take the opposite of x- coordinate and keep y- coordinate.
Answer:
$1,83,000
Explanation:
Sales = 4,535,000
Cost of goods sold = $2,560,000
Operating expenses = $1,382,000
Average total assets = $4,110,000
Net Income = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Operating expenses
= $4,535,000 - $2,560,000 - $1,382,000
= $5,93,000
Target income = 10% of Average total assets
= 0.10 × $4,110,000
= $410,000
Thus,
Residual income = Net income - Target income
= $5,93,000 - $410,000
= $1,83,000
I believe the answer is C
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
In each other presentation, choosing the “Reuse Slides” tool and then browsing to find the credits slide in the original presentation.
Brainliest please!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Current issues in the framework by regarding fabricating costs as a period cost
Assembling overhead is evaluated bu increasing direct work with 300%. This estimation isn't exact and doesn't speak to how the genuine variable sub-costs that form the manufacturing overhead act for example machine related costs, arrangement work, getting and creation control, designing, bundling and sending. In spite of the fact that there could be a connection between the measure of direct work cost and the all out manufacturing overhead, this present strategy for estimation is dubious and ignores the real segments of manufacturing overhead.
Advantage of Product Cost
Increasingly exact impression of the inconstancy of the sources for example on the off chance that there are five factors, it is more precise than one.
Advantage of Period Cost
Treating manufacturing overhead as a period cost implies that it stays simpler to contrast Wilkerson's and a rival, given that contender likewise treats manufacturing overhead as a period cost for example it is simpler to analyze like-for-like