Answer: Explanation:
The marginal rate of substitution of peaches for avocados is the maximum amount of avocados that a person is willing to give up to obtain one additional peach. When consumers maximize utility, they set their MRS equal to the price ratio, Pp/PA
where
,
P
p is the price of a peach and
PA is the price of an avocado.
In Georgia, avocados cost twice as much as peaches, so the price ratio is ½ , but in California, the prices are the same, so the price ratio is 1. Therefore, when consumers are maximizing utility (assuming they buy positive amounts of both goods), the marginal rates of substitution will not be the same for consumers in both states. Consumers in California will have an MRS that is twice as large as consumers in Georgia.
Answer:
In an e-business innovation cycle, after an organization scans the environment for new emerging and enabling technologies, the next step is to match the most promising new technologies with current economic opportunities.
It should be noted that the study of how resources are distributed for production of goods and services within a social system is called Economics.
<h3>What is Economics?</h3>
Economics can be regarded as a social science which focus on the study of production as well as distribution, and consumption of goods as well as services.
Therefore, economics focus on how resources are distributed for production of goods.
Learn more about economics at:
brainly.com/question/25791968
It is to be noted that the demand for sandwiches and ice cream cones consumed after the price of ice cream cones rises to $2 a piece will both reduce (all things being equal).
<h3>Why would the demand for both items reduce?</h3>
The demand for both goods will both come down because they are complementary or joint demand goods.
A pair of goods are termed "joint demand" when both must or usually is consumed with the other.
Recall that (where all things are equal) demand will decrease as price increases.
Learn more about demand at;
brainly.com/question/1245771
#SPJ11
Answer:
c. John's capital account for $41,400
Explanation:
Based on this information it can be said that in this scenario the journal entry to record the admission of John as a new partner would include a credit to John's capital account for $41,400. This is mainly because even though Bobbi sold his interest for $63,900 his actual interest capital in the partnership was that of $41,400 .... meaning that John now holds a partnership capital of $41,400 and the Bobbi profited $22,500