Answer:
Answer is given below.
Explanation:
-Income from Continuing Operation 700000
-Discontinued Operations
-Loss from operations of 60000
discontinued segment (75000*80%)
-Gain on disposal of discontinued 168000 108000
segment (210000*80%)
-Net Income 808000
To correct avoid high unemployment, one of the measures done by the architects of Bretton woods is to agree on building a limited flexibility into the fixed exchange rate system. In addition, it was stated in the argument that the rules and regulations of the monetary management between the U.S., Canada, Western Europe, Australia, and Japan must be systematically established.
Answer:
value of the firm = 21.20 million
value of the firm = 20.80 million
Explanation:
given data
current profits = $400,000
annual rate = 4 percent
opportunity cost = 6 percent
solution
we get here value of the firm before pays out current profits as dividend is express as
value of the firm = current profits ( 1+opportunity cost ) ÷ ( opportunity cost - annual rate ) ................1
put here value
value of the firm = 
value of the firm = 21.20 million
and
value of the firm after pays is
value of the firm = current profits ( 1+annual rate ) ÷ ( opportunity cost - annual rate ) ................2
value of the firm = 
value of the firm = 20.80 million
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Materiality.
Explanation:
The Materiality principle refers that one of the accounting standards can be left behind only if it has an irrelevant impact on the financial statements. According to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) only when an item is "<em>immaterial</em>", provisions for the transaction derived from that item are not mandatory. But, the definition of what is material and immaterial is not provided by the GAAP, then, it relies on the judgment of the accountant.
Answer:
The exchange rate is the value for which one currency can be exchanged for another. Thus, for example, 20 Mexican pesos are needed to acquire an American dollar.
Technically, it could happen that a country changes its exchange rate with respect to a hard currency (such as the Dollar or the Euro) through fixed exchange rates, in order to increase the value of the salaries of its citizens, measured in international currencies. For example, if the Mexican government fixed a parity between the dollar and the peso of value 1 to 1, the minimum wage of Mexicans would go from being worth $ 215 to multiplying by 20, that is, to $ 4,300.
Now, in practice, this situation is practically impossible, since it would imply a monetary modification in the country that makes the adjustment, since otherwise it would imply an unprecedented inflationary peak.
