A mutation causes a dog to be born with a tail that is shorter than normal. Which best describes this mutation? It is harmful be
cause it obviously affects the dog’s survival. It is harmful because it affects the dog’s physical appearance. It is neutral because it does not obviously affect the dog’s survival. It is beneficial because it affects the dog’s physical appearance.
I would say that the answer would be the 3rd option (it's neutral) because it doesn't affect the dogs chance of survival and although it does affect the dogs appearance it doesn't really cause any difficulties for the dog. if I'm wrong i apologize
The correct answer is "It is neutral because it does not obviously affect the dog’s survival."
Explanation:
Even though the tail was necessary in wildness to keep the balance specially when hunting, in the domestic life it doesn't affect the dog's survival because they no longer have to fight for food, in wildness it could affect his breeding possibilities or even the possibility to be eaten, but now it doesn't.
It related to the psychological state of being identified with a particular job and is degree to which a job is central to a personal identity. And from an organization perspective is the key to unlocking the employee's motivation and productivity.
This is the case of exposing the trade secret of a business. The word "may" has significant impact here as the court may or may not hold Mort liable(depending on the circumstances) since the trade secret isn't expressly protected by Southern Bar-B-Q albeit implied that an employee doesn't divulge the trade secret of the business which could bring damages to it.
Culture is fluid rather than static, which means that culture changes all the time, every day, in subtle and tangible ways. Because humans communicate and express their cultural systems in a variety of ways, it can be hard to pinpoint exactly what cultural dynamics are at play.
