<span>There are several terms that are indicative of the tendency to get away from the unknown, including:
Aversion to ambiguity
Clustering illusion
Anchoring and adjustment
Recency bias
Availability bias</span>
A) to amuse, because the passage contain many funny jokes and asides.
Explanation:
While any SAT article may have a funny interpretation or an aside it is unlikely that a possible interpretation of only the funny or amusing elements just for the sake of being amusing would be required to be talked about on the text.
If<u> the humor is to be interpreted it has to be along with the theme that the passage conveys that it should work and not entirely on its own as being amusing for amusement's sake.</u>
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
In a democratic society, price controls and minimum wage laws would hurt the democracy unless the people decided on the laws together as a body; if not, then the people may be disrupted, and consequences will be faced. So your answer should be D.
Offers financial assist, because when the government needs more students, they will control the finances and etc. of the poor.
If the bank stopped paying interest, the governmental money would most likely go up, but then people wouldn't use banks as much as they used too; they would store their money in other, safer places (since the bank would end up turning into the equivalent to hiding it under your floorboards or elsewhere). SO although the governmental money would increase, it would also hit a decrease.
