Human rights in the United States comprise a series of rights which are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, including the amendments,[2][3] state constitutions, conferred by treaty, and enacted legislatively through Congress, state legislatures, and state referenda and citizen's initiatives. Federal courts in the United States have jurisdiction over international human rights laws as a federal question, arising under international law, which is part of the law of the United States.[4]
The human rights record of the United States of America is a complicated matter; first and foremost the Federal Government of the United States has, through a ratified constitution and amendments thereof, guaranteed unalienable rights to citizens of the country, and also to some degree, non-citizens. However, the historical evolution of these rights must be considered as well, as the periphery of the population of the United States who had access to these rights has expanded over time, and in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has not fully expanded complete rights to all human beings within its borders as compared to the international standard set by the United Nations General Assembly, because of social and political issues that stem from the history of the United States.
Though there are no options available in the question Ayuba Diallo is one of the prominent slaves during the Transatlantic slave trade.
- He was known to have been a Senegalese slave merchant who was later captured by the slave traders in 1731.
- He was then transferred to England two years after where he was set free and transferred back to his home country.
- He was also known to be the subject of a portrait painted by the artist William Hoare in 1733.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Ayuba Diallo is once a slave trader and a victim of slavery. And he has a portrait by William Hoare.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/3910406
Answer:
Plato believed that the aristocracy would allow only people with the right intellect to rule the country efficiently. He believed that aristocracy was the combination of wisdom and virtue and that this is reserved for only a limited number of noble citizens who have full access to the highest quality education.
Explanation:
The aristocracy is a way of establishing a national government through specific people in society who would have all the power of governance in a country. These people would be chosen through noble lineage and wealth.
Aristoteles and Plato were great supporters of these systems, as they believed that only people with full access to quality education would have sufficient ethical and moral intellect to be a head of government. Only nobles had this access.
These philosophers believed that the aristocracy was much better than democracy, because democracy gave freedom to anyone to stand for political office, in addition to allowing people who had no access to education and therefore a "low intellect" to choose those who would represent the government.
Although today, some people believe that the aristocracy is a good form of government, we know that it is not right to believe that. This is because keeping a country's governance power in the hands of a single family, where the post of head of state is chosen through a lineage is very dangerous.
Democracy allows us to remove tyrannical and inefficient leaders from power and choose that candidate who represents ideas that will benefit the country and lead its people to advance.
Im pretty sure it might be A!
Answer:
A. Contour
Explanation:
Contour planting is a farming practice that helps reduce or prevent soil erotion through, the planting of crops along the contour.
A contour is are lines developed across a slope at the same level of elevation of the slope. A slope referes to land which slants downwards.
The contours prevent the free flow of rain water down the slope, hence trapping soil particles that would otherwise erode. They also reduce the speed with with running water, goes down the slope.
