Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
n=400 represent the random sample taken
X=59 represent number of defectives from the company B
estimated proportion of defectives from the company B
is the value to verify
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to verify if the true proportion of defectives is higher than 0.1 then the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment
Answer:
5 + 7
Step-by-step explanation:
3 + 2 = 5, 4 + 3 = 7
Answer:
To determine what is the difference between "6 + A" and "6 x A", the logic of the proposed mathematical operations must be explained:
In "6 + A", the value A is added to the initial value 6. Thus, for example, if A were worth 10, to the initial value 6 10 units are added, with which the final value is 16.
In contrast, in "6 x A", the initial value 6 is multiplied by as many times as the value A indicates. Therefore, continuing with the value of A as 10, in this case 6 would be multiplied by 10 times, giving a final value of 60.
First, you must find the side length. It is a hexagon so there are 6 sides. You take the perimeter by 6 48/6 and get 8. Then plug it into formula (3 sqrt 3)/2 a^2 where a is side length. Plug into formula and get an answer of 166.28 in^2