Answer:
Dividend paid = (5%× 10,000 × $10) = $5000.
Explanation:
<em>Preference shares entitles the holders to participate in a fixed dividend out of the profit made by the company. The divide is always a fixed percentage of the nominal value of the preference shares</em>
It can be cumulative and non-accumulate.
Cumulative <em>simply implies that should the company misses the payment of dividend in a particular year such unpaid dividend would be carried carried forward and paid in arrears in the following year/</em>
Non-cumulative i<em>s the exact opposite of the case . Here, unpaid dividends are not paid in arrears in fact such are forfeited for life.</em>
Dividend in Year 1
Dividend paid in Year 1 was $ 4000 but ought to be $5,000 (5%× 10,000 × $10). An arrear of $1000
Dividend in Year 2
Dividend paid = (5%× 10,000 × $10) = $5000.
Note that the unpaid dividend of $1,000 in year 1 is lost forever
Criticism can be looked at in many different perspectives. Criticizing on one subject by looks may not bother you, but criticism about your athletic ability might make you feel negative about yourself. For me personally, I attempt to ignore the criticism and if not I express it to my friends.
B increase development cost for new chemical products
Answer:
a) Absolute Value Inequality => Absolute(0 + y) < 2
b) -2 < y < 2
Which means, Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible.
Explanation:
<u><em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department.
</em></u>
<em>a) Absolute Value Equation:</em>
Absolute(0 + y) < 2
where y represent the location of the new house and 0 represents the location of the fire department.
Furthermore,
<em>Absolute(0 + y) < 2 = (0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is +ve. </em>
and
<em>Absolute(0+y) <2 = -(0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is -ve.
</em>
b) When (0 + y) is +ve,
we have, (0 + y) < 2.
<em>Solving for y and subtracting 0 from both sides. </em>
0-0 + y < 2 - 0
<em>y < 2</em>
and when (0 + y) is -ve,
<em>we have, - (0 + y) < 2.
</em>
Solving for y:
- 0 - y < 2
multiplying negative from both sides
<em>y > - 2</em>
<em>So, we have -2 < y < 2 </em>
<em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible. </em>
Answer:
The income effect and substitution effect work in opposite directions and income effect is dominant.
Explanation:
In case of a normal good, both the income effect as well as substitution effect work in the same direction. A fall in the price of a product will increase the purchasing power of the consumer so its quantity demanded will increase.
The consumers will also prefer the cheaper good so the substitution effect will cause the quantity demanded to increase.
In case of an inferior good, however, income elasticity is negative. The income effect and substitution effect work in opposite directions.
A price decrease in the case of an inferior good will increase the real income and purchasing power of the consumer. This will cause the quantity demanded of the inferior good to decline as the consumer will prefer a substitute normal good.
