The strength of the it is that it reminds all theorists that they are also are a product of what they study and that they should also never forget that. There is never a final objectifying.
whereas, the disadvantage of it is it seems inevitable almost that engaging in such a deep and complex study will have an different effect on the sociologist’s ability to work with the everyday world in a free and uncomplicated manner.
I don’t necessarily have enough time to do the essay for you, because I have my own work to do. However, I can tell you right now that the best option to go with would be option B. There are more relations here, and all of the movements for rights are similar in many ways. A few various components you could include in your response are as follows:
1. The women’s rights movements were similar to Black civil rights movements because both were put at the bottom of the barrel and had to fight their way up to equality through protests, movements, and sometimes revolts if provoked.
2. They also are similar because there is a resemblance in how they were both treated; they both were seen more as property and merchandise rather than humans. This was even confirmed by the Dred Scott Decision and the 3/5 Compromise.
3. There also is a connection because most of the women who fought for their rights WERE black. Because of this double-disadvantage, they had to fight twice as hard and they knew as much, if not more, than anyone else did about having to fight for equality.
These are a few points to help you. For now, I must go. I wish you the best!
Answer:
There are over thirty principal meridians in the US.
Explanation:
Answer:
I'll try to watch it (if I have time) thanks for the recomendation
Explanation: