During the day, due to the existence of sunlight, the procedure of photosynthesis elevations over that of respiration. Photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide to produce carbohydrates removing oxygen as a byproduct. During the night, because there is no sunlight, the rate of photosynthesis decreases. This, therefore, drives the rate of respiration to surpass the speed of photosynthesis. In respiration, oxygen is consumed and carbon dioxide is dismissed.
<h3>What is
photosynthesis?</h3>
- Photosynthesis is the process by which manufacturers use sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to produce oxygen and energy in the form of sugar.
- The primary position of photosynthesis is to transform solar energy into chemical energy and then reserve that chemical energy for prospective use. For the most part, the planet's living designs are powered by this process.
- An illustration of photosynthesis is how plants convert sugar and significance from water, air, and sunlight into energy to grow. Description of photosynthesis is the procedure through which plants use water and carbon dioxide to assemble their food, grow and remove excess oxygen into the air.
To learn more about photosynthesis, refer to:
brainly.com/question/19160081
#SPJ4
<span>During neutralization reaction
Milliequivalent of acid=milliequivalent of base.
Milliequivalent of HCl=0.100*12*1
Milliequivalent of NaOH=M*10*1
So 0.100*12*1=M*10*1
Solve for M.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
= Initial pressure = 200 kPa
= Final pressure
= Initial temperature = 
= Final temperature = 
We have the relation
The pressure that would be exerted after the temperature change is .
Answer:
Carbon dioxide is a product (cellular respiration)
Carbon dioxide is a reactant(photosynthesis)
Carried out in animals(cellular respiration)
Carried out in plants(both)
Chemical reaction(cellular respiration)
Oxygen is a product(photosynthesis)
Oxygen is a reactant(cellular respiration)
Produces usable energy source(photosynthesis)
Your welcome!!! Plz mark brainliest.
In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
