1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitriy789 [7]
3 years ago
9

A car is traveling up a steep ramp to a parking garage.the ramp is 445 feet long and rises a vertical distance of 80 feet. What

is the angle of elevation from the car to the end of the ramp? Round to the nearest degree

Mathematics
2 answers:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
4 0
<span>You have that the ramp is 445 feet long and rises a vertical distance of 80 feet.

 Therefore, you mus apply the following proccedure:

 Sin(</span>α)<span>^-1=Opposite/Adjancent
 Sin(</span>α)<span>^-1=80/445
 </span>α=10°
<span>
 What is the angle of elevation from the car to the end of the ramp?

 The answer is: 10°</span>
Alecsey [184]3 years ago
3 0
With the information provided in the problem, we can create a right triangle with the ramp as its hypotenuse, and  the vertical rise as its opposite side from its angle of elevation.
Let E be the angle of elevation from the car to the end of the ramp. We now know that the hypotenuse of our triangle measures 445 feet, and the opposite side measures 80 feet, so we need a trig function that relates our angle of elevation with the hypotenuse and the opposite side. That function is sine:
sine(E)= \frac{80}{445}
E=arcsine( \frac{80}{445} )
E=10.36

We can conclude that the angle of elevation from the car to the end of the ramp is 10.36°.

You might be interested in
Which statement is best supported by the information in the box plots?
solmaris [256]

Answer:

B is the correct

Step-by-step explanation:

choose as brinliest

4 0
3 years ago
The admission at the movies is $5 for children and $10 for adults. The total amount collected was
sesenic [268]

Answer:

Number of children, x= 400

Number of adults, y = 100

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number of children be x

Let the number of  adults be y

Given : Total number of people,  x + y = 500  --------(1)

           Total amount collected, 5x + 10y = 3000  ---------(2)

(1) => y = 500 - x

Substitute y in (2) : 5x + 10(500 - x) = 3000

                             5x + 5000 - 10x = 3000

                                -5x = 3000 - 5000

                                 -5x = -2000

                                    x = 400

Substitute x in (1) : 400 + y = 500

                                      y = 500 - 400

                                      y = 100

4 0
2 years ago
The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}

Where:

S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}

S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}

\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}

\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}

And we can find the intercept using this:

b=\bar y -m \bar x

And the model obtained for this case is:

y = -3.4 +5.2 x

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:  

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0
3 years ago
How do you write 4(8m-7n)+6(3n-4m) in expanded form
Aloiza [94]
4(8m-7n)+6(3n-4m) =32m-28n+18n-24m=8m-10n


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please Help me!!! I have 5 more Questions left to ask.
Delicious77 [7]
Use photomath it will also help
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If they are similar or not?
    15·1 answer
  • Polygon ABCD has the following vertices:
    14·2 answers
  • Express the following in exponential notation:<br> (-13) X (-13).<br> 35 times
    11·1 answer
  • How do I find the slope of The line that passes through (0,2) and (8,8) ? Please help and please help me know how to solve it so
    15·2 answers
  • 9. The table below shows the change in a stock price over a period of a week. If 12 shares of
    9·1 answer
  • Two six-sided dice are rolled. Find the probability that the sum of the two faces that turn up is between 1 and 14.
    12·1 answer
  • 15 + r as a verbal expression
    7·1 answer
  • I'm begging you please please help please please ASAP please please help please please ASAP please please help please please ASA
    12·1 answer
  • Please help I will award beau l’ovest answer
    11·1 answer
  • The number 2 in the expression 5+2x is called the coefficient of x. how does changing the coefficient to 6 change the meaning of
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!