1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
salantis [7]
4 years ago
7

Can someone explain censorship in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

English
1 answer:
Ganezh [65]4 years ago
5 0
The life of guy Montag, a fireman in a near future dystopia to make an argument against mindless conformity and blissful ignorance
You might be interested in
I say we must not speak the unspeakable name of love to the windless stars, but hold it like a candle flame and whisper hope, ea
alexandr402 [8]

"... but hold it <em>like </em>a candle flame..."


The main idea of the poem is up to whoever, as poems are very subjective, however what I understand, the poem is about a forbidden love.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the key elements of a resume? Check all that apply.
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following situations could best be used to show/illustrate the meaning of bypassed?
Dmitrij [34]
The best answer is B.

Explanation, “bypassed” means to go around and by finding another trail is basically going around the other one
4 0
3 years ago
Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from
Mars2501 [29]

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

8 0
4 years ago
What is the key idea of the section titled “Cruel &amp; Reprehensible”?
Sliva [168]
D I think it’s d because
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from “The Fall of the House of Usher” by Edgar Allan Poe. Shaking off from my spirit what must have been a drea
    5·2 answers
  • 1. How should you decide whether a fact or idea belongs in your research report?
    5·1 answer
  • On which principle do Descartes and Galileo agree?
    6·2 answers
  • In which order are the characters questioned by Inspector Goole?
    9·1 answer
  • ............................................ delete
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a keyword search? A. "Why does my HR department look at emotional labor?" B. "How do I f
    5·2 answers
  • Read the sentence.
    12·2 answers
  • Identify the choice that best describes the underlined word for questions 5–8.
    10·2 answers
  • I need to wright a 1-3min. dialogue about 2 friends meeting after a long time​
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these words is an endocentric compound?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!