1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
3 years ago
14

Operation Wetback:

History
1 answer:
Virty [35]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B: was a military operation that rounded up illegal aliens found in Mexican-American neighborhoods for deportation.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
3. Briefly explain how Social Darwinism contributed to European imperialism. (2 points)
inessss [21]
To quote the witch in Snow White "Who's the fittest of them all?" Who but those who think they are powerful enough to occupy colonies who supply raw materials to be shaped into manufactured articles, to be sold back to the colonies? 

That is the definition of imperialism. It is the colonization by force of those unable to prevent the colonization.  Imperialism is the creation of an empire by colonizing people that can't prevent their own subjugation.

Does that not sound like survival of the fittest to you?
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true about most state constitutions? Delegated powers are thoroughly described in most state constitut
Firlakuza [10]
There are two true statements. First, delegated powers are thoroughly described in state constitutions. Second, <span>The Constitution describes the federal government more than most state constitutions describe state powers.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Union troops continued to occupy Fort Sumter in 1860 because
Luba_88 [7]
I believe the answer to be A. The Confederacy could not seize federal property.

Hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Which country explored large portions of South, Central, and North America
GaryK [48]
South America is the answer I think.
8 0
3 years ago
What might be a far-reaching result if the court decided in favor of the speaker?
OverLord2011 [107]
<span>Since the decision of the Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not respected.</span></span>
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is being able to amend the constitution important??
    8·1 answer
  • How did the assembly line help make cars affordable for more Americans?
    8·2 answers
  • The Seneca Falls Convention addressed the issue of slavery in the Southern states. unequal education among children. women's rig
    6·1 answer
  • How did the spread of the ottoman empire affect european trade?
    7·1 answer
  • Question 10 (5 points)
    5·1 answer
  • The Clinton Administration saw the largest increase in what during his term in office?
    6·1 answer
  • Layers in a Feudal System
    12·2 answers
  • Is "Roaring into Chaos" a fitting title for this time period?? To what extent did WWI help to shape and develop the social and p
    5·1 answer
  • At times the fed Monetizes rises to death in order to
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Texans demand public education be established by the Constitution of the Republic of Texas?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!