These types of damages are called “Compensatory damages”.
<span>Willis breached the contract but the breach was not
material. So as a way to compensate for the damages Willis have made, he
offered instead to pay $300 to put the correct faucets and linoleum in the
powder room.</span>
Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the fourth choice or letter D.
The statement "<span>Social Security is applied to all wages up to the maximum taxable earnings. Medicare is applied to all wages without limit." best </span><span>explains the relationship between Social Security and Medicare taxes.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, the missing question read;
Version 1: George walks away. He never talks to Elaine or Jerry again.
Version 2: George confronts Elaine, saying “I am angry about what you have been saying. I do not want you spreading rumors about me. If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
Version 3: George yells at Elaine to shut u.p and then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired.
Version 4: George demands that Elaine tell him where she heard that. Elaine tells him not to worry about it and tries to crack a joke about how much the boss is late.
Answer:
- <u>Version 1: non-confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 2: cooperative</u>
- <u>Version 3: confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 4: confrontational and cooperative</u>
Explanation:
1. In this scenario it is evident that George avoids confrontation with Elaine. In fact, we are told that "[He] walks away..."
2. In this scenario, however, we notice a cooperative deposition between George and Elaine. He made this lear when he said, "...If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
3. Confrontation occurs in this scenario as we are told that "George... then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired. "
4. By demanding "that Elaine tells him where she heard that" indicates confrontation. While Elaine's cracking a joke about how much the boss is late shows cooperation.
Answer:
a. Jasmine can be removed for cause.
Explanation:
Voir Dire is the questioning phase of jury selection in which the attorneys of both sides ask questions to see if the jury members are qualified.
When someone is removed for cause it means that the attorney thinks that the jury member can't be impartial based on bias or conflict.
In this case Jasmine can't be impartial because of her past relationship with the prosecutor.