Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer: Crime leads to social injustice based on the discrimination that is prevalent in society. There is discrimination based on caste, religion, status and also power. … If the criminal is someone powerful or belongs to a higher class in the society then he misuses his power and money to get released.
Answer:
a. mandatory sentences
Explanation:
Mandatory sentences is a type of sentence which a judicial officer is required to impose regardless of the circumstances of the offense. It is to ensure that the offender does not escape punishment. Mandatory sentencing requires that offenders serve a predefined term for a specific crime and the judge does not have the discretion to increase or reduce the sentence. It is fixed for a particular crime by the law.
Most employers look in social skills and hard working in the new employee.
