1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir [108]
3 years ago
7

Who was Winston Churchill? Why would Americans trust what he has to say about the Soviet Union? *

History
2 answers:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Winston Churchill was the prime minister of Great Britain during World War II and took the office after Neville Chamberlain resigned in 1940. Churchill led Great Britain to victory and was a key figure in organizing the Allies to defeat the Axis Powers.

They trusted him because he was an ally.

Explanation:

ikadub [295]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Winston Churchill was a British politician and army officer. He was the Prime Minister of the UK during WWII, when he led Britain to victory along the Allied Powers. Americans would trust what he had to say about the Soviet Union because America was also apart of the Allied Powers and Britain was one of America's strongest allies.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What books to read for ancient history​
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

There are many books but I personally suggest the following :-

1) The Twelve Caesars. by Suetonius and translated by Robert Graves.

2)The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. by Edward Gibbon.

3)The Roman Revolution. by Ronald Syme.

The Roman Triumph. by Mary Beard.

4)Pagans and Christians. by Robin Lane Fox.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put t
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Historically, the primary reason the lines leading to Birkenau were never attacked was due to a lack of political resolve to do so, and not because bombing operations were unimportant. When the gas chambers were operational in 1941, the majority of the concentration camps were located out from the range of Allied bombers and German air defenses.

The Allied Forces knew about the detention camps by June 1944, and the German air defenses were on the decline. Bomber efficiency is improving. The railroads were still intact. Every day, thousands of Jewish are processed in these centers.

Historians agree that the Nazis would still murder the Jews even without the concentration camps. The mobile death squads were among the most prolific extermination organizations of the Nazis. Even though the bombs wouldn't halt the murders, the Allied focused on the bombings of military camps and industrial areas in order to undermine Germany's war operations.

Explanation:

Railways were an important component of the Holocaust and Nazi activities. Information on the camps was only accessible after the war had ended. They felt that the costs would exceed the advantages of bombing the railroads. Millions of Jews had already been gassed.

Had the Allied Forces simply bombed the railroads once they had the intelligence, many lives might have been spared. They only needed political will and a commitment to social duty, regardless of the personal dangers, in order to put a stop to the camps' deadly activities.

Soviet forces were the major Allied soldiers in the Eastern Front, where they committed genocide of their own people. Stalin also has anti-Semitic inclinations. We may be certain that he didn't bomb the railroads and let the Germans continue to use the extermination camps.

Hope this helps, if so would you mind saying thanks?

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the cold war affect united states domestic policy and american society?
Drupady [299]
It kindve help and hurt us a little bit so...
3 0
3 years ago
Adam is planning to deliver a speech on the topic of the Civil War. Which two sources should he consult?
Helga [31]

Answer:

the battle of bunker hill

4 0
2 years ago
What limitations does the Torah have as a historical source ?<br>​
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

The limits is that the Torah has high chances of having many stories over-exaggerated or a bit tweaked which does not make it a good historical source. To be considered as a strong and reliable historical sources, it needs what historian called as a primary sources.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • britain wanted control over the (suez canal, panama canal, royal canal) because it was the shortest naval route between (the atl
    5·2 answers
  • The Supreme Court's ability to determine constitutionality of laws and actions is known as the principle of
    10·1 answer
  • Plessy v. Ferguson is a famous case because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that _____________ was protected by federal law?
    10·1 answer
  • ONE Impact gutenbergs printing press bad On Western Europe was
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the United States follow a policy of isolationism after World War I? How did Americans support the war effort?
    9·1 answer
  • Insert your own news caption below describing how ethnic rivalries and alliances systems propelled the world into ww1
    7·2 answers
  • What was one of the points the Federalists stressed in the Federalist Papers?
    7·2 answers
  • Where was the French and Indian War fought? Question 3 options: A) Great Britain B) America C) Canada D) France
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these reasons describes why Spain was motivated to compete with Portugal?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not part of the court system in the Republic of Texas?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!