I had to take a screenshot of my response since it was getting flagged for being inappropriate for some reason.
Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
Answer:
descending tracts is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The correct answer Is true
Answer: <u>Sinks towards the outer core
</u>
Explanation: The material which is less dense, means it is lighter in weight. Such substances tend to move more towards the crust of the Earth, whereas the heavier substances like iron, is more towards the core or centre of the Earth. This is because heavier substances tend to sink deeper. That’s why the light elements are found in the crust section of the Earth.
