Answer:
Explanation:
One group of students did an experiment to study the movement of ocean water. The steps of the experiment are listed below.
Fill a rectangular baking glass dish with water.
Place a plastic bag with ice in the water near the left edge of the dish.
Place a lighted lamp near the left edge of the dish so that its light falls directly on the plastic bag.
Put a few drops of ink in the water.
The student did not observe any circulation of ink in the water as expected because the experiment had a flaw. Which of these statements best describes the flaw in the experiment? (2 points)
Not enough ink was added.
Not enough water was taken.
The dish was too small for the experiment.
The lamp and the ice bag were at the same place.
Answer:
All of this above.
Explanation:
All the mentioned practices can be use to prevent breaches.
Answer:
I don't think so. In today's computer era, many different solution directions exist for any given problem. Where OOP used to be the doctrine of choice, now you would consider it only when the problem at hand fits an object-oriented solution.
Reason 1: When your problem can be decomposed in many different classes with each many instances, that expose complex interactions, then an OO modeling is justified. These problems typically produce messy results in other paradigms.
Reason 2: The use of OO design patterns provides a standardized approach to problems, making a solution understandable not only for the creator, but also for the maintainer of code. There are many OO design patterns.
