All categories

3 years ago

Strategies on how businesses can cope with financial strain

1 answer:

8 0

Money can be the number one source of frustration in relationships. These frustrations ring true for couples regardless of the length of their courtship or the number of years they have been married. This Tip Sheet offers tips to help couples handle the financial strain that often accompanies a long-term relationship.

For many couples, ample money can represent fun, good health, a new car, or owning a home. However, lack of money can mean frustration, anxiety, credit card debt, foreclosure, and even depression.

While money means different things to different people, there is no denying that we all need it! And for everyone, especially couples, the challenge is to manage it consistently.

You might be interested in

Would this topic be studied in microeconomics or macroeconomics: If the amount of money in the economy increases more than the a

AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

Both microeconomics and macroeconomics involve examining economic behavior, but they differ in terms of the scale of the subjects being studied.

Explanation:

Microeconomics is the field of economics that looks at the economic behaviors of individuals, households, and companies. Macroeconomics takes a wider view and looks at the economies on a much larger scale—regional, national, continental, or even global. Microeconomics and macroeconomics are both vast areas of study in their own rights.

8 0

3 years ago

Central banks are responsible for the collection and the replacement of currency from circulation.

Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": True.

Explanation:

Central banks are the financial institutions in charge of the monetary policy of their country on behalf of the central government. They regulate the money supply and the interest rates to maintain a country's economy the closest to its equilibrium level. In the United States, the central bank is the Federal Reserve (<em>Fed</em>). Central banks also collect and replace the currency in circulation.

4 0

3 years ago

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics Omnibus Household Survey is conducted annually and serves as an information source for t

sasho [114]

Answer:

a) For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

b) For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each

c) First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

$Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080$ respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

$\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%$

d) For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

$\frac{1036}{44}=23.55$

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

Explanation:

For this case we have the following data given:

Number of respondents that they strongly agree with the statement = 44

Number of respondents that they somewhat agree with the statement = 130

Number of respondents that they somewhat disagree agree with the statement = 165

Number of respondents that they strongly disagree agree with the statement = 741

Part a

Do the responses for this statement provide categorical or quantitative data?

For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

Part b

Would it make more sense to use averages or percentages as a summary of the responses for this statement?

For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each category so then not makes sense calculate averages for this case.

Part c

What percentage of respondents strongly agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving?

First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

$Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080$ respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

$\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%$

Part d

For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

$\frac{1036}{44}=23.55$

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

8 0

3 years ago

On January 1, 2012, Knapp Corporation acquired machinery at a cost of $750,000. Knapp adopted the double-declining balance metho

Kobotan [32]

Answer:

B .) $54,857

Explanation:

Depreciation rate using double reducing balance method is calculated as 10% divided by the number of years of useful life; this is then multiplied by 2. The depreciation is then calculated as the depreciation rate X Net Book Value of the asset

The depreciation rate for the first year = 100%/10 * 2 = 20%

2012

The depreciation expense = 20% X $750,000 = $150,000

The net book value at the end of the year = $750,000 - $ 150,000 = $600,000

2013

The depreciation expense = 20% X $600,000 = $120,000

The net book value at the end of the year = $600,000 - $ 120,000 = $480,000

2014

The depreciation expense = 20% X $480,000 = $96,000

The net book value at the end of the year = $480,000 - $ 96,000 = $384,000

2015

At the beginning of 2015, the method was changed to straight line method. In line with the International Standards of Accounting on change in accounting estimates (ISA 8), this change would be applied progressively i.e the remaining net book value would be divided over the remaining no of useful life to arrive at the year depreciation

As at the beginning of 2015, 3 years have passed. The remaining no of useful life is 7 years and the NBV is $384,000 as seen in the computation of NBV at the end of 2014

Depreciation = $384,000/7 = $54,857

4 0

3 years ago

The present value (PV) of an investment is ________.

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Present Value relates to the amount that an investment would yield if the benefit were realized today. it is said to be the value of the future economic benefits an entity can generate

8 0

3 years ago