Answer:
-0.89 (i think)
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the graph seems to be going downwards from the right, it has a negative correlation. And since the data seems to be pretty close together, the correlation must be strong. That narrows the answer down to -0.89
If its wrong then i'm not a smart person, and it's -0.15
Answer:
<em>R</em><em>M</em>79 608.51
Step-by-step explanation:
First year,
<em>RM</em>505 050.00×5%=<em>RM</em>505 050.00×5/100
=<em>RM</em>25 252.50
second year,
(<em>RM</em>505 050.00+<em>R</em><em>M</em>25 252.50)×5%=<em>RM</em>530 302.50×5/100
=<em>RM</em>26 515.13
third year,
(<em>R</em><em>M</em>530 302.50+<em>R</em><em>M</em>26 515.13)×5%=<em>R</em><em>M</em>556817.63×5/100
=<em>R</em><em>M</em>27840.88
three years interest,
<em>RM</em>25 252.50+<em>RM</em>26 515.13+<em>RM</em>27840.88=<em>RM</em>79608.51
<em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>R</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>R</u></em><em><u>M</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u>f</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>R</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>y</u></em>
<u>H</u><u>o</u><u>p</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>c</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u>l</u><u>p</u><u>!</u>
Answer:
Take a line segment AB = 2 units (consider 1 unit = 2 cm) on x-axis.
Draw a perpendicular on B and construct a line BC = 1 unit length.
Join AC which will be √5 (Pythagoras theorem). Take A as center, and AC as radius draw an which cuts the x-axis at point E.
The line segment AC represents √5 unit
Neither are correct.
Navene has broken the problem up and simply added numbers together to get "4577"
Annabelle is also wrong because whereas she multiplied, she also broke up the numbers in the equation to get "46710"
The answer should be 18,690,300
