Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) created to Regulate the stock market
.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Securities and Exchange Commission was created to regulate the stock market of the USA. It stands as a watchdog which surveys over security transactions to stop fraud and deception. The main motto of the SEC is said to be the prevention of deceptive and manipulative fraudulent practices of the stock market and also the monitoring of the takeover of corporate companies in the financial market.
Generally, the issue of securities to investors happens over the internet or in the mail. SEC checks whether the firm selling such securities are registered with SEC or not. Registration with SEC ensures that the firm issuing such securities are not engaged in any fraudulent activities.
Answer:
As demographic changes began occurring, people became more aware of the importance of this new area as it was growing rapidly and natural resources were abundant.
Due to the new metal and iron, this area was now armed with weapons.
These groups eventually moved to southeastern Europe, the Aegean, the Mediterranean, and southwest Asia. These migrations took over the weaker populations such as the Egyptians and Minoans.
Natural changes like droughts and dust storms forced the Zhou people to settle on the edges and eventually they lost their dynasty.
The correct option is D. During the last six months of the war, the United States of America, release atomic bombs on two different cities of Japan within a short space of interval. This move was not expected at all by the Japanese and it served as the final stroke that breaks the elephant's back. It leads to quick surrender by the Japanese.
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
The United States Civil War was the bloodiest war in American history.
