All categories

4 years ago

Critically analyse the difference and the point of convergence between floor inspection and functional inspection

Business

1 answer:

olasank [31]4 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The overview of the give scenario is described in the explanation section below.

Explanation:

The distinction between Floor as well as Function Inspection was that these techniques are being used to eliminate and locate faulty materials until the identical happens in manufacturing. Quality is the key objective of both processes, where expectations are reviewed and evaluated to ensure that the operation is carried out correctly.
The differences between the parties would be that the system in the Floor Inspection needs to be checked the content in the process mostly on the machine rather than at the beginning of manufacture to ensure that every device or floor is functioning correctly. This would be to ensure that the industrial automation expenses will not go out and then go hand in hand as well as the fault could've been readily identified.
But from the other side, the Functional evaluation could have the primary purpose verified, which is something the brand is motivated to deliver. For example, an electric motor could've been verified if it has the correct performance and reliability. It doesn't inform us more about the difference throughout all sections, but somehow it provides everyone a wider understanding of both the happiness that comes from inspecting the very same item.

You might be interested in

Which project type creates a competitive advantage that enables the organization to earn a greater than normal return on investm

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

a breakthrough project

Explanation:

Having competitive advantage <em>implies</em> being in a condition or circumstance that puts an organisation in a favorable business position.

Therefore, a Breakthrough Project would create a competitive advantage that enables the organization to earn a greater than normal return on investment than its competitors, because it is like a<em> disruptive innovation.</em>

4 0

3 years ago

Assume Baldwin Corp. is downsizing the size of their workforce by 15% (to the nearest person) next year from various strategic i

Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Percentage downsize in the workforce = 15% = 0.15

Cost of exit interviews = $100

Normal separation cost = $5,000

Now,

Total separation cost per employee = Cost of exit interviews + Normal separation cost

= $100 + $5,000

= $5,100

Therefore,

The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year

3 0

3 years ago

Last year Oliver Inc had a total assets turnover of 1.60 and an equity multiplier of 1.85. Its sales were $200,000 and its net i

schepotkina [342]

Answer:

7.4%

Explanation:

As we know that

ROE = Profit margin × Total asset turnover × Equity multiplier

where,

Profit margin = (Net income ÷ Sales) × 100

= ($10,000 ÷ $200,000) × 100

= 5%

So, the ROE would be

= 5% × 1.60 × 1.85

= 14.8%

Now if the net income is increased by $5,000

So, the updated profit margin would be

= (Net income ÷ Sales) × 100

= ($15,000 ÷ $200,000) × 100

= 7.5%

And updated ROE would be

= 7.5% × 1.60 × 1.85

= 22.2%

So, the change in ROE would be

= 22.2% - 14.8%

= 7.4%

4 0

4 years ago

Does higher exonomic growth lead to low inflation?

mixas84 [53]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

On the contrary, high economic growth may lead to high inflation. Economic growth is indicated by an increase in the value of the gross domestic product GDP. The GDP measures economic growth by calculating the values of all the finished goods and services in a country per period.

Economic growth may be a result of an increase in aggregate demand. The government may institute monetary and fiscal stimulus measures that increase the demand for goods and services. Increased demand results in inflation because consumers will have too much cash, but few goods and services are available. When growth is due to an increase in productivity, inflation is minimal. Inflation is a general increase in prices. Prices usually go up with an increase in economic activities.

3 0

4 years ago

On July 1, Year 1, Danzer Industries Inc. issued $40,000,000 of 10-year, 7% bonds at a market (effective) interest rate of 8%, r

sammy [17]

Answer:

1. Journalize the entry to record the amount of cash proceeds from the issuance of the bonds on July 1, Year 1.

Dr Cash 37,282,062

Dr Discount on bonds payable 2,717,938

Cr Bonds payable 40,000,000

2. Journalize the entries to record the following:

a. The first semiannual interest payment on December 31, Year 1, and the amortization of the bond discount, using the straight-line method. Round to the nearest dollar.

discount on bonds payable = 2,717,938 / 20 coupons = $135,896.90

December 31, Year 1, first coupon payment

Dr Interest expense 1,535,896.90

Cr Cash 1,400,000

Cr Discount on bonds payable 135,896.90

b. The interest payment on June 30, Year 2, and the amortization of the bond discount,using the straight-line method. Round to the nearest dollar.

June 30, Year 2, second coupon payment

Dr Interest expense 1,535,896.90

Cr Cash 1,400,000

Cr Discount on bonds payable 135,896.90

3. Determine the total interest expense for Year 1.

$1,535,896.90

4. Will the bond proceeds always be less than the face amount of the bonds when the contract rate is less than the market rate of interest?

yes, if the market rate is higher than the coupon rate, the bonds will sell at a discount.

5. (Appendix 1) Compute the price of $37,282,062 received for the bonds by using the present value tables in Appendix A at the end of the text. Round to the nearest dollar.

bond price = PV of face value + PV of coupon payments

PV of face value = $40,000,000 x 0.4564 (PV factor, 4%, 20 periods) = $18,256,000
PV of coupon payments = $1,400,000 x 13.590 (PV annuity factor, 4%, 20 periods) = $19,026,000

bond's market price = $18,256,000 + $19,026,000 = $37,282,000

6 0

3 years ago