Future decisions about whether to produce ethanol for gasoline or for hand sanitizer would not be informed by the sunk costs they incurred to retrofit their plant.
<h3>What are sunk costs?</h3>
Sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Sunk cost should not be considered when making future economic decisions.
To learn more about sunk cost, please check: brainly.com/question/26502221
#SPJ1
Answer:
the investment advisor should do nothing
Explanation:
In the scenario that is being described, the investment advisor should do nothing. This is because the investment advisor did nothing wrong or illegal, he simply followed the instructions that were strictly provided by the clients, therefore acting in accordance with the customers' wishes. Meaning that he has nothing to fear from the client's being accept because they have no standing to take legal action against the advisor.
Answer:
Richard should have use <u>b</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>v</u><u>i</u><u>t</u><u>y</u> and <u>p</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>c</u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u>i</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u> </u>in his ad to make it better.
Explanation:
Brevity is similar to shortness and percision is the most suitable answer because fluidity means changable and the comparability mean it can be similar and comparable
Answer:
past experience is a good guide for decision making, but so is information related to possible future outcomes.
Explanation:
The rational expectations theory refer to a concept and modeling technique that is applied widely in macroeconomics. In this the individual depend their decision on three main factors i.e. human rationality, available information and the past experience
As per the rational expectations theory the future should always be taken in expectation with regard to the decisions and it is vital for the same.
So as per the given situation, the above should be the answer