Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
Answer:
Cost of each bottle of water is $7.
Explanation:
This is the case for economies of scale. When Charles produce 1 bottle of water, it costs him $1 per bottle, when 8 bottles are produced it costs him $7. The cost per bottle of water reduces as units increases.
If they have alot of money then it might be hard for them to save because they have enough or if they dont have alot of money then they just wanna have alot of items i do that sometimes☺
Answer: Son's argument should fail
Explanation:
The son's defense will fail because the location of the easement is not governed by reasonableness as it had been established at its current location by the neighbor.
It can not now be changed arbitrarily by the son because the original owner had allowed it to be built. The easement's location is therefore established by actions between the original owner and the neighbor and so it is a binding location.
Answer: True
Explanation:
The Hawthorne studies were designed originally in order to show the relationship that existed between productivity and the workplace conditions.
A study like the the level of lighting was used to show correlation with the productivity of the workers and the result was that demonstrated that no matter what the levels of light and noise were, there was an increase in the worker productivity because the workers liked the attention they received by being part of a study.
