1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
3 years ago
11

Why did Governor Eugene Talmadge strongly oppose President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal programs? Select TWO.

Social Studies
1 answer:
irina [24]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answers are A & D; Talmadge opposed programs that benefited African Americans. Talmadge opposed increasing government spending.

Further Explanation:

Governor Talmadge was in elected into office January 1933 and stayed in office until January 1937. He was then reelected In January 1941 and stayed in office as the 67th governor until January 1943.

He did agree with 34 of the policies of the New Deal out of the 44 that the president proposed. In addition to being against government spending he was against any program that benefited African Americans. He also was against the following programs;

  • Farm programs
  • Relief work programs

Learn more about the New Deal at brainly.com/question/3255454

#LearnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
The framers of the Constitution were all well-todo, socially prominent Americans. Did they produce a document that was fundament
ANEK [815]

Answer and Explanation:

The Constitution itself establishes a representative democracy, or republic, not a pure democracy. In that sense, I guess you could say it's "undemocratic," although that word seems to have connotations about the electoral process that aren't exactly accurate.

The framers of the Constitution were very concerned about a majority rule changing fundamental laws. While they made the Constitution a flexible document that provided for the possibility of amending, it is an extremely laborious task to do so. The idea is that no temporary majority can significantly affect the rights and protections of the citizenry.

To a large extent, that changed with one critical writing. In 1905, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote the dissent in Lochner v. New York which established the concept of an "empty Constitution." That means that the prevailing legal theory to this day is that the Constitution does not in fact establish *anything* and in lieu of judicial precedent, the will of the people at any snapshot in time is effectively law. This is typically a leftist judicial outlook.

One of the biggest ironies of this decision is making it's way through the appellate courts right now: the California Prop 8 issue. Of course the leftists (rightfully) side with those who support gay marriage. However, if the case is to be decided in their favor, i.e. that a majority cannot vote away someone's right, it will be a repudiation of Holmesian doctrine. If the courts uphold the Holmesian standard, they will be forced to rule that the popular vote can, in fact, restrict rights of the people--in this case, the first amendment right of freedom of association.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about women in the workforce is false?
nikklg [1K]
The correct answer is <span>D. More than half of women work in all countries in the industrialized world.

This is incorrect because there are many countries in the industrialized world where female workers are still not allowed the same rights as men. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the decision the Supreme Court reached in Texas v. Johnson affect the protections offered by the first amendment
Studentka2010 [4]
Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag outside of the convention center where the 1984 Republican National Convention was being held in Dallas, Texas. Johnson burned the flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan. He was arrested and charged with violating a Texas statute that prevented the desecration of a venerated object, 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case of two Arizona brothers charged with torturing three men, each brother's fate was decided by a different jury. One b
qaws [65]

Answer:

One of them was found guilty and the other was not

Explanation:

A conviction is when the court finds someone guilty of a crime and a acquittal is when the court finds the defendant not guilty of a crime.

6 0
3 years ago
Plagiarism is always avoided if you put ideas into your own words. TRUE or FALSE
quester [9]
Your answer would be True
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • A school is considering a major change to its grading system. It recognizes that even though students work hard and do well for
    7·1 answer
  • "sociology…is different for all because each must find a way to live in a world that threatens even while it provides. grace is
    6·1 answer
  • The following are characteristic of adolesencents expect
    14·1 answer
  • Brent is an athlete who has always loved to play catch or shoot baskets with others, and he frequently seeks to do both with his
    9·1 answer
  • When we talk to a friend about an emotion, we narrate a story. Bruner (1986) has contrasted the narrative mode of thinking with
    10·1 answer
  • How does social interaction in crowded public places differ from interactions in other settings?
    7·1 answer
  • What year (BC/B.C.E.) did the Egyptians successfully settle the world’s oldest civilization, and how long after Mesopotamia was
    12·2 answers
  • Even though Mexico became independent in 1821, people of Spanish origin still held most of the power. In fact, even though they
    8·1 answer
  • How do we know that the real Anastasia died with her family?
    12·1 answer
  • Pega what advantage does skimming provide over lock and roll as a versioning option?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!