Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
The most efficient way is to make one person pack food and the other deliecering the food.
After Scout companions Boo back to his home, she silences on the Radley porch and recollecting her father’s advice about how “you never actually know a man till you stand in his shoes and walk about in them.” Scout now sees her minute world from Boo’s eyes as if it is he standing there, viewing the happenings of the past two years. She comprehends that Boo has perhaps seen much of the children’s doings and standing there she recalls them more brightly than ever earlier. Like running to encounter Atticus, fighting on a path, and discovering gifts in the undisclosed knothole to name a few.
Answer:
1) divine presents in male and female godess. In this way, Hindus
can have a personal relationship with the divine; the deities are
showed in murti with their symbols and means.
2) Avatars: the appearance of the divine in living form, example: Krishna and
Rama- some Hindus see Ghandhi and Jesus as avatars. The life
of the human being is a announcement of the nature of the divine
Explanation:
