Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:
The alternate hypotesis is:
The test statistic is:
In which X is the sample mean, 
is the value tested at the null hypothesis, 
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that 
The test-statistic is:
The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Answer:
n = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Use power rule: 
.
2) Cancel the base of z on both sides.
2n = 10
3) Divide both sides by 2.
4) Simplify 
to 5.
n = 5
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The difference of 2 cubes identity is:-
a^3 - b^3 = (a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2).
335/1000 if you read it out loud .335 is three hundred fifty-five thousandths
When you add up all the angles, it would be equal to 180 degrees.
Since angles 2 and 3 are congruent, angle 3 is also equal to 6x + 24.
We know also that angles 3 and 4 are complementary, so (6x+24) + 5x = 90.
Let's find x.
6x+24+5x = 90
11x = 90-24
11x = 66
x = 6
Angle 2 and 3 are 6(6) + 24 = 60 degrees
Angle 4 is 5(6) = 30 degrees
180 - 60 - 60 - 30 = 30 degrees
Angle 1 is equal to 30 degrees :D :D
