Why do you think that the small stuff makes such a difference for business?

1. Standard Oil of Connecticut, Inc., sells home heating, cooling and security systems. Standard schedules installation and serv

Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

The installers and experts are self employed because;

Standard Oil of Connecticut, Inc has no influence over the work other than finishing the venture by a specific time and the installers and experts can pick the days wherein they need to work.
The installers and specialists are occupied with various business as the business is into deals and The installers and experts are into administration.
The work isn't done heavily influenced by business. Professionals and installers are not managed by Standard Oil of Connecticut, Inc and they don't assess their work.
The devices are not given by the business and the installers and experts utilize their own gear and instruments.
The installers and experts are utilized for a specific time-span till the fulfillment of the undertaking and are not utilized for long.
The strategy for installment is through a set rate for every venture and not by time-frame.
The installers and professionals are authorized and affirmed by the state and are having particular abilities which are not increased through the business.

Every one of these conditions fulfill the necessities of self employed entity as indicated by measures utilized by the courts and doesn't fulfill the standards of representative.

5 0

3 years ago

A debtor owed a creditor $1,200 on a promissory note that was due on August 1. After the debtor told the creditor that he might

Ilya [14]

Answer:

The correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as the options are omitted. The question is therefore completed before answering the question by providing the options as follows:

A. No, because the debtor incurred no additional detriment that would serve as consideration for the new agreement.

B. Yes, because it would have cost the creditor $1,200 to purchase the entertainment system himself.

C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

D. Yes, because the new agreement between the debtor and the creditor is enforceable with or without

Explanation of the answer is now provided as follows.

It is possible to enforce the two parties' new agreement as an accord.

An accord can be described as an agreement in which one party to an existing contract agrees to accept some other, different performance from the other party in lieu of the performance that the other party is obligated to provide. In principle, an agreement must be backed by payment, but the consideration can be less than the amount agreed upon in the preceding contract if it is of a different character or the claim is to be paid to a third party. The responsibility of the debtor to supply the creditor with a new entertainment system was enough fresh consideration to constitute a legal agreement in this case.

When a party's responsibility is modified in some way, as the debtor's duty was in this case, the preceding legal duty rule does not apply. It makes no difference whether the creditor's benefit in the accord arrangement is equal to the original debt's worth; courts will find appropriate consideration if the consideration is fresh or different in any way. The difference in the debtor's obligation, that is, payment is in the form of an entertainment system rather than cash) is enough to sustain the accord arrangement, regardless of how much the entertainment system would have cost the creditor.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not apply because the original agreement was not for the sale of goods. The underlying commitment in this case was to pay a debt secured by a promissory note.

Therefore, the correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

6 0

3 years ago

Fifty-five percent of what a listener feels about a conversation he has just completed is based on _____.

IrinaK [193]

Answer:

The answer is the other person’s nonverbal communication.

Explanation:

The concept mentioned in the question comes from Albert Mehrabian’s misquoted research results, which stated that in communication, 55% of our perception about the conversation comes from non-verbal communication, 38% from the tone of the speech, and 7% from the actual content of the conversation. However, this quote was wrongly cited, and Mehrabian himself has refuted this, since it is only selectively citing a research experiment that he conducted, which following research replicating the conditions have consistently debunked.

3 0

3 years ago

The research and development team of BB Beverages has discovered that, during the testing process, one of their highly profitabl

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer: Societal Marketing

Explanation:

Based on the information given in the question, we can deduce that BB Beverages embraces a societal marketing orientation.

Societal marketing orientation occurs when the marketing decisions that are made by companies benefutbthe society as a whole and that the satisfaction of their wants isn't at the detriment of the society.

This is shown when the activities of the company can being about a water shortage in areas surrounding the plant which led to the company stopping production.

4 0

3 years ago

An agreement between two duopolists to function as a monopolist usually breaks down because:

Burka [1]

Answer:

c. each duopolist wants a larger share of the market to capture more profit.

Explanation:

An agreement between two duopolists to function as a monopolist usually breaks down because each duopolist wants a larger share of the market to capture more profit.

When the market is occupied by few firms as it is in the case of a duopoly, the possibility of collusion exists because it is characteristic of duopolies to set price and determine quantity to be produced in the bid to maximize profits. Nevertheless this collusion is usually short-lived because ultimately each firm faces the selfish desire of gaining more market share by cutting prices.

5 0

3 years ago