Answer:
Systematic error
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that none of the judges are biased, the most likely reason for this difference is the occurrence of systematic errors.
Systematic errors are errors introduced by inaccuracy in the experimental design, be it in the observation or measurement process.
In this case, the reaction time from observing the finish and stopping the clock for each judge might be different, which configures a systematic error.
Given the table below which contains data from 200 endothemic reactions involving <span>sodium bicarbonate:
![\begin{tabular} {|c|c|} Final Temperature Conditions&Number of Reactions\\[1ex] 266 K&48\\ 271 K&60\\ 274 K&92 \end{tabular}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%0A%7B%7Cc%7Cc%7C%7D%0AFinal%20Temperature%20Conditions%26Number%20of%20Reactions%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%0A266%20K%2648%5C%5C%0A271%20K%2660%5C%5C%0A274%20K%2692%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D)
We find the probability distribution function as follows:
Let X denote the final temperature, then
</span>
<span>

</span>
Answer:1/12 or 8.3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
this is 8 p
Step-by-step explanation: