Answer:
I believe that Carl Lee Hailey was sane, just that he was overcome by rage because of his daughter's abduction. Even though he was acquitted due to insanity, that was only due to his brother's attorney's quick thinking.
Explanation:
This assertion is accurate. Police composite sketches are made more so that suspects or victims will be recognized by friends, family, and acquaintances than in the anticipation that a passerby will recognize someone from a sketch as they pass by.
<h3>The purpose of police composite sketches</h3>
Police primarily use facial composites in their (often serious) criminal investigations. In an effort to identify the suspect, the suspect's face is recreated using these photographs. In archeological investigations, facial reconstruction can be utilized to visualize ancient mummies or human remains.
<h3>Accuracy of composite sketches</h3>
Hard numbers are hard to find, however some study indicates that less than 20% of the time, composite photos or facial sketches of suspects are helpful. According to other studies, the number may potentially be as low as 8%.
<h3>How are police sketches created?</h3>
In order to construct a composite sketch, a forensic artist typically speaks with witnesses and victims at the crime scene. This artist may also work as a patrol officer or a private contractor. The composite could be entirely drawn by hand or digitally.
Learn more about forensic artist: brainly.com/question/22025785
#SPJ4
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.
And statements are usually made in court.
Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.
is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules
Answer:
It is cheating people
and they owe them in full a contract is a contract and they fulfilled their responsibilities
