1st one is "extended tripod grip" and second one is "rotating the paper with your free hand and pulling it towards your body".
The answer to the question above is "no, the business is not optimizing" according to the information shown on the question above. In this situation, we have the greater marginal revenue (4=8*(1-1/2)) than the marginal cost (0)and the business is not in its full capacity. The parking lot business can increase its marginal cost to achieve its full capacity to gain more profit.
Answer:
$0.35
Explanation:
The computation of the price elasticity of demand using mid point formula is shown below:
= (change in quantity demanded ÷ average of quantity demanded) ÷ (percentage change in price ÷ average of price)
So, Change in quantity demanded would be
= Q2 - Q1
= 40 - 30
= 10
Now, Average of quantity demanded
= (40 + 30) ÷ 2
= 35
Change in price
= P2 - P1
= $35 - $15
= $20
And, the average of price would be
= ($35 + $15) ÷ 2
= $25
Cross price elasticity of demand = (10 ÷ 35) ÷ ($20 ÷ $25)
= 0.28 ÷ $0.8
= $0.35
<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
