Answer:
Well dont you only know the answers to those
Explanation:
Carl Vinson was extremely supportive of the US Navy in their roll of defense, however, though this is the case he never favored the financial gain of under US military branches to aggregate the Naval funds at the time. So the first answer, answer A, if false. Though Carl Vinson was pro Navy, this didn't mean that the Navy could start retiring it men, the number stayed roughly the same, because of course we had people actually retiring or enlisting. This makes option B false. Other nations were always a threat, maybe no apparent to the US but seeing how the United States reacts to situations, this is a gross understatement. Option C is false. His efforts DID in fact help naval expansion needed in order to defend Pearl Harbor during attack. Option D is correct.
Answer:
Np! I got ur back!
Explanation:
The federal government has a statutory obligation to pay 10% of the federal revenue account to local governments. Also, the federal government determines how the local government share of the federation accounts is shared out to them. Additionally, the federal government can give specific grants to local governments for specific services. Hope that helped! ;)
