No, because as you said it "does NOT contain fact-based details" therefore it is not reliable. If something doesn't contain fact-based details, it isn't reliable.
I’m not sure about this but this looks like a legit conversation to me:
Hello can I help you?
Yes, please, I would like a bag of sugar.
Yes, of course. Anything else?
I would like a loaf of bread and a carton of milk, please.
Is that all?
Yes, that’s all.
That’s twenty pounds, please.
Here you are!
Thank you!
Answer:
Explanation:
My opinion is that the educational system is always socializing on climate change and how it will affect the youths after us. Now the youths have to live with what the people did before them and how they ruined the earth.
I agree with this cartoon because if we keep on destroying the earth and using fossil fuels we will ruin our future generations.
Hope this helps :D
Answer: its the third one
Explanation:
Answer: I would go with B.
Explanation: The group of words for option B seem like they would be used more for contrasting than option D. It can't be option A or option C because those options use comparing signal words.
