1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hichkok12 [17]
2 years ago
11

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the full search of the house was unreasonable, but a search of the arrestee was permit

ted "to remove any weapons that the [arrestee] might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape" and to "seize any evidence on the arrestee's person in order to prevent its concealment or destruction."a) Chimel vs. California
b) Rawlings vs. Kentucky
c) Knowles vs. Iowa
d) Sibron vs. New York
Social Studies
1 answer:
andrew11 [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a) Chimel vs. California

Explanation:

The Chimel vs California case was a result of police officers going to Chimel's home with a warrant that authorized his arrest for burglary. After the warrant was served, the police officers comprehensively searched the house of Chimel. The search revealed various items that were used as exhibit to convict Chimel. The State Courts upheld Chimel's conviction. However the Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision, did not find the search of the full house reasonable, as a search warrant would be needed for this cause.

You might be interested in
Michael manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. to renew his flight certificati
Yuki888 [10]
Yes, i believe it was.
<span> the agency should have allowed him to present evidence which stated that he did not know the statements he made on his application were false.
</span>Manin could avoid the accusation by claiming that he would've provided the necessary information about his convictions, if only the<span> national transportation safety board mentioned it in the requirement.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What tests do archaeologists use to determine how old a fossil or artifact is?​
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

Explanation:The approximate age of ancient artifacts can be determined as long as the artifact is not older than 50,000 years. It’s a technique called carbon-14 dating. All organisms that live on the Earth are based on carbon. This would be wood, plants, animals and of course humans.  

There are three different isotopes of carbon, C-12, C-13, which are stable, and C-14. Carbon-14 is used for dating because it is radioactive and considered unstable. It will decay, or emit radiation, over a long period of time at a near consistent rate. The rate of decay, which can be measured, is 5,730 years equals one half-life.  

Carbon-14, described by Argonne National Laboratory, is produced in Earth’s atmosphere when N-14, Nitrogen, from New World Encyclopedia, atoms are bombarded by cosmic rays from space. They collide with the N-14 atoms and convert them into C-14 atoms. This collision changes a proton into a neutron. The C-14 then combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, CO-2. This is then absorbed by plants and animals.  

All living things are replacing their carbon-14 as they continue living. Once they die the dating process begins. The radioactive carbon-14 begins to decay. It is very difficult to date organisms less than 1,000 years old because there is too much carbon-14 present. The same problem happens on the other end of the spectrum when an organism is older then 50,000 years, when there is not enough carbon-14 to measure.  

Accelerated Mass Spectrometry (AMS) as explained by llnl.gov, was started by J.J. Thomson, from Nobel Prize.org, in 1897. “At first there were very few who believed in the existence of these bodies smaller than atoms. I was even told long afterwards by a distinguished physicist who had been present at my (1897) lecture at the Royal Institution that he thought I had been, ‘pulling their legs.” This by Scrips.edu.  

Beginning in the early 1900’s, mass spectrometry has been used to calculate the age of organisms using the carbon-14 isotope. Ions are accelerated in a field of millions of volts and smash through a gas or carbon foil. These ions then come to a stop in a gas ionization detector. Ion identity is determined by how fast they slow down.  

Carbon-14 slows down faster than a nitrogen-14 isotope of the same mass. The AMS is a million times better at detecting the ratio of isotopes, by Colorado Edu,  than by conventional means. It’s this ratio that determines the age of the item tested. The AMS can recognize one carbon-14 isotope among a quadrillion different carbon atoms.  

Dinosaur fossils, by All About Creation, cannot be age tested using the carbon-14 method because they are millions of years old. To determine their age the isotope’s from uranium-238, uranium-235 and potassium-40 are used. They all have a half-life of more than a million years.  

Dinosaur fossils are found in sedimentary rock. The isotope’s needed to determine age are rarely found in sedimentary rock. Those isotopes are found in igneous rock made from cooled magma. No fossils are found in igneous rock because when it forms it would be too hot and destroy the bones. Scientists study neighboring layers of sedimentary rock that was formed at approximately the same time as the igneous rock. This gives them an approximate age of the fossil.  

Using this method, scientists estimate the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, USGS. Moon rocks are the same age lending weight to the theory that the Earth and Moon formed at the same time.    

4 0
3 years ago
An example of a Monarch during the Middle Ages is
Lyrx [107]

I am pretty positive it's A. because her and king luis were the monarchs over France.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1990 the city of Atlanta was awarded this prestigious international athletic competition that was to take place 6 years later
matrenka [14]

Answer:

Summer Olympics

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following factors helped Bill Clinton win the presidency in the election of 1992? A. A recession was occurring at t
Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

A. A recession was occurring at the time

Explanation:

The election of President Bill Clinton in 1992 was favored because then-President George Bush embittered a drop in his popularity due to the economic recession that took place during his tenure (1989-1993). Bush prioritized foreign policy in his administration and increased bellicose spending, causing the fiscal deficit to widen considerably and contributing to the recession. This was probably the biggest cause of American dissatisfaction that culminated in the election of Bill Clinton.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is war requiring increased industrial production called?
    11·1 answer
  • In circumstances involving millions of emitters of small amounts of pollution who have no strong interest in trading, __________
    11·1 answer
  • For this assessment, you will investigate and explain different examples or technologies that relate to the properties and inter
    6·1 answer
  • What is genocide? I need a log answer.​
    5·1 answer
  • The __________ is the Executive department responsible for overseeing U.S. foreign policy.
    12·1 answer
  • Harrison is a rugby player. During his matches, he starts, stops, and moves his body quickly in different directions with speed
    8·1 answer
  • What did anceint greak artist use to create sculptures
    5·1 answer
  • German noble who helped train the continental army is?
    5·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 25
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. The residents of Collin County in Texas mostly pay their property taxes online. For which program wil
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!