Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the statement that is not possible would be Kelly having a comparative advantage in repairing cars and in cooking meals. This is because a when having a comparative advantage you are better at something but at the same time you are giving up other opportunity costs. Therefore in this scenario Kelly can only have a comparative advantage at either repairing cars or cooking meals but not both.
Dane and the other stockholders will lose their investments but nothing else. Because Dane and others are stockholders in this company, they will lose the money that they had invested in the company and they will no longer receive any dividend from the company again because the company has gone bankrupt. Dane and others are not liable for other debts that had been acquired by the company.
Idk idk idk idk idk idk im sorry btw its just for the starting thing
Answer:
<em>Gabrielle's economic decisions best relate to broad economic goals by still having a job during the evening and still pursuing on doing artistic projects..</em>
Economic cartoons is your answer
