Answer:
E, B, D, C, A, G, H, F
Explanation:
Bonds Payable - <em>Long-term liabilities</em>
Buildings - <em>Fixed assets</em>
Accrued Liabilities - <em>Current liabilities</em>
Intangibles - <em>Intangible assets</em>
Inventory - <em>Current assets</em>
Unearned Rent Revenues - <em>Revenue</em>; advanced paid rentals
Accumulated Depreciation - <em>Expense</em>
Retained Earnings - <em>Stockholder's equity</em>
Answer:
I think that a small business introducing a new line of clothing and accessories should use the penetration pricing policy. The penetration pricing policy prices their products very low to start out with to try and distract competitors from there competition and towards them.
Explanation:
Hope that helps!
Answer and Explanation:
Given:
μ = 75 million
SD = 17 million
Probability (x) raw data = 110 million
Computation:
= Probability (x) < 110 million
= Probability [(x-μ) / SD] < [(110 - 75) / 17]
[(x-μ) / SD] = Z
= Probability [z] < [(35) / 17]
= Probability [z] < [2.05882353]
Using z calculator:
P-value from Z-Table:
Z score = 0.98024
Therefore, probability is 0.98024
Complete Question:
Determine the utilization and the efficiency for each of these situations:
a. A loan processing operation that processes an average of 7 loans per day. The operation has a design capacity of 10 loans per
day and an effective capacity of 8 loans per day.
b. A furnace repair team that services an average of four furnaces a day if the design capacity is six furnaces a day and the
effective capacity is five furnaces a day.
c. Would you say that systems that have higher efficiency ratios than other systems will always have higher utilization ratios than
those other systems? Explain.
Explanation:
It's not (true) actually. Whether the design capacity is comparatively (high), the utilisation could be (low) even though the efficiency was (high).
Utilisation = Output / Design capacity = 
x 100%
Efficiency = Output / Effective capacity = 
Utilisation = 
Efficiency = 
U = 1000/2000
e = 1000/1000
Answer:
100 bushels of oranges
Explanation:
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared to other countries.
for Greece
opportunity cost of producing oranges = 20 / 100 = 0.2
opportunity cost of producing tomatoes = 100/ 20 = 5
For turkey
opportunity cost of producing oranges = 30 / 40 = 0.75
opportunity cost of producing tomatoes = 40 / 30 = 1.33
Greece has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges. If it specialises in the production of oranges, it would produce 100 bushels
