Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
The answer would be A. high taxes, you would not NEED high taxes, although that is what the government wanted.
Metternich, the architect of the Concert of Europe<span>, used it to suppress ... Russia also witnessed the Polish Revolt (
</span>
Answer:
It occurred august 4th, 1735 in the colony of New York. This case is about the government who tried to silence a man because they didn’t like what he was saying. At the time the government was the king and there was no First Amendment. The jury found him not guilty because they saw this for what it was. This is a good example of the colonists believing the government should have limited power, and led directly to the First Amendment 40 years later
hope this helps!✌️
yes, this is correct. I hope I helped <3
