Volume of carbon dioxide absorbed = 33.6 L ≈ 34 L
Explanation:
We have the following chemical reaction:
CO₂ (g) + 2 LiOH (s) → Li₂CO₃ (s) + H₂O (l)
Now we devise the following reasoning:
if 1 mole of carbon dioxide reacts with 2 moles of lithium hydroxide
then X moles of carbon dioxide reacts with 3 moles of lithium hydroxide
X = (1 × 3) / 2 = 3/2 moles of carbon dioxide
And we calculate the volume of carbon dioxide using the following formula:
number of moles = volume / 22.4
volume = number of moles × 22.4
note: units for 22.4 are "L / mole"
volume of carbon dioxide = (3/2) × 22.4 = 33.6 L ≈ 34 L
Learn more about the reaction of carbon dioxide with metal hydroxides:
brainly.com/question/6979534
brainly.com/question/4316721
#learnwithBrainly
To know this you pretty much do have to kind of memorize a few electronegativities. I don't recall ever getting a table of electronegativities on an exam.
From the structure, you have:
I remember the following electronegativities most because they are fairly patterned:
EN
H
=
2.1
EN
C
=
2.5
EN
N
=
3.0
EN
O
=
3.5
EN
F
=
4.0
EN
Cl
=
3.5
Notice how carbon through fluorine go in increments of
~
0.5
. I believe Pauling made it that way when he determined electronegativities in the '30s.
Δ
EN
C
−
Cl
=
1.0
Δ
EN
C
−
H
=
0.4
Δ
EN
C
−
C
=
0.0
Δ
EN
C
−
O
=
1.0
Δ
EN
O
−
H
=
1.4
So naturally, with the greatest electronegativity difference of
4.0
−
2.5
=
1.5
, the
C
−
F
bond is most polar, i.e. that bond's electron distribution is the most drawn towards the more electronegative compound as compared to the rest.
When the electron distribution is polarized and drawn towards a more electronegative atom, the less electronegative atom has to move inwards because its nucleus was previously favorably attracted to the electrons from the other atom.
That means generally, the greater the electronegativity difference between two atoms is, the shorter you can expect the bond to be, insofar as the electronegative atom is the same size as another comparable electronegative atom.
However, examining actual data, we would see that on average, in conditions without other bond polarizations occuring:
r
C
−
Cl
≈
177 pm
r
C
−
C
≈
154 pm
r
C
−
O
≈
143 pm
r
C
−
F
≈
135 pm
r
C
−
H
≈
109 pm
r
O
−
H
≈
96 pm
So it is not necessarily the least electronegativity difference that gives the longest bond.
Therefore, you cannot simply consider electronegativity. Examining the radii of the atoms, you should notice that chlorine is the biggest atom in the compound.
r
Cl
≈
79 pm
r
C
≈
70 pm
r
H
≈
53 pm
r
O
≈
60 pm
So assuming the answer is truly
C
−
C
, what would have to hold true is that:
The
C
−
F
bond polarization makes the carbon more electropositive (which is true).
The now more electropositive carbon wishes to attract bonding pairs from chlorine closer, thereby shortening the
C
−
Cl
bond, and potentially the
C
−
H
bond (which is probably true).
The shortening of the
C
−
Cl
bond is somehow enough to be shorter than the
C
−
C
bond (this is debatable).
Answer:
To obtain a desired component from the mixture
Explanation:
It is also important to be able to separate mixtures to be able to better understand how each component contributes to the properties, chemical and physical, of the resulting mixture.
Answer:
A physical change is where something looks different but still has the same particles, like a change in state or size. Hope this helps!
Explanation: