Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
The correct answer is "true". Sorry for the late response
Picture 1
A reflective essay is a text in which a writer relates their experiences and feelings to communicate a message to the reader.
Write 1 - 2 paragraphs answering the following questions:
. What are two central messages Annie Dilard is communicating through her narration of this episode? How does she develop those messages in the text?
As you are brainstorming ideas for your response, think about additional questions that may help you identify details from the text to support your response.
. Which details and examples from the text support your analysis?
. Which vocabulary or word choices I used to support your analysis?
Now you are going to write 1 - 2 paragraphs answering the following questions: What are two central messages Annie Dillard is communicating through her narration with this episode? How does she develop those messages in the text?
Picture 2
Answer: Increase the Earned Income Tax Credit for childless workers. Establish work schedules that work.
Explanation:
Answer:
individuals with darker skins and higher socioeconomic status were likely to experience more intense racism, which contributed to higher blood pressure
Explanation:
The initial finding shows that
Dark skins + darker skins with higher socioeconomic status = higher chance of blood pressure
In plain sight, this might be seen as a genetic correlation (there is something within people in darker skin's genetic that lead to the blood pressure)
But, if we step back and examine more carefully there is also other factors that influence high blood pressure : Stress level.
When people are faced with daily racism, they will feel huge amount of threats due to the aggressive behavior and insults that trowed by other people around them. If this happen constantly within prolonged period of time, it will lead to higher blood pressure within that target group. Especially if they are higher in socioeconomic status. They become more well known to the people and invite more aggressors.
