Answer:
Their net operating income for the year was $39,628
Explanation:
Flip or Flop's net operating income for the year = Gross revenue - Cost of Goods Sold - Operating expenses
Their Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) was 21% of gross revenue, therefore:
Cost of Goods Sold = 21% x $93,200 = $19,572
The company has operating expenses for this same period of $34,000.
Net operating income for the year = $93,200 - $19,572 - $34,000 = $39,628
Answer:
Prices increase, C
Explanation:
Inflation is when the value of a dollar, or other currency type, drops. This happens most commonly when more money is being printed. The more there is, the less it is worth. This causes prices to increase.
Hope this helps
Answer:
$48,800
Explanation:
Ratio = 2:3
Total investment:
= Benson capital + Orton capital + Ramsey capital
= $60,000 + $40,000 + $20,000
= $120,000
Total Equity of Ramsey:
= 40% of Total investment
= 0.4 × $120,000
= $48,000
Old partners contribution:
= Equity of Ramsey - Ramsey capital
= $48,000 - $20,000
= $28,000
Benson’s capital balance after admitting Ramsey:
= Benson’s capital - Old partners contribution(2 ÷ 5)
= $60,000 - [$28,000 × (2 ÷ 5)]
= $60,000 - $11,200
= $48,800
I agree with the first person
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
